Every four years, the Bitcoin (BTC) community celebrates the Bitcoin halving. Many BTC market analysts view this as a quadrennial milestone event due to its historically bullish impact on the cryptocurrency market as a whole.

As the market edges closer to Bitcoin’s fourth halving on April 19, let’s dive into five fascinating facts about this phenomenon that even seasoned crypto-enthusiasts might not know.

Bitcoin price’s up over 650,000% since the first halving

Historically, Bitcoin’s price has increased following a halving, though this largely hinges on the balance of supply and demand.

Historical data provides some insights: After Nov. 28, 2012, the day of Bitcoin’s first halving, its price climbed from $11 to the then-record high of $1,240 a year later. Similarly, after the second halving in July 2016, Bitcoin’s price surged from around $650 to a new record high of $20,000 in December 2017.

In May 2020, after the third halving, Bitcoin’s price boomed from around $8,8000 toward $69,000 in November 2021. So, Bitcoin’s returns since the first halving stand at an astounding 650,000%.

Multiple catalysts have spurred demand for Bitcoin following its halving events. For instance, during 2020-2021, a generally dovish stance by global central banks significantly contributed to Bitcoin’s price rally.

Related: Crypto market ‘underestimates the long-term impact’ of Bitcoin halving: Bitwise

Halvings test miners’ economic resilience

Each halving reduces the income that miners receive for verifying transactions, making profitability more challenging, especially for those with higher operational costs. This situation pressures miners to either upgrade to more efficient technology or cease operations.

For instance, after the third Bitcoin halving in May 2020, the average cost to mine one BTC rose, as the blue wave in the chart below illustrates. 

The rise in operations costs squeezed smaller players out of the market, potentially increasing network centralization. 

Pre-halving price rallies can be speculative

The anticipation of a Bitcoin halving often leads to speculative price increases.

For example, in the six months before the 2020 halving, Bitcoin’s price increased by over 40%, from around $7,000 in November 2019 to approximately $10,000 by May 2020.

BTC/USD weekly price chart. Source: TradingView

These gains are often driven by speculative investors hoping to capitalize on the post-halving price increase, reflecting historical patterns and leading to volatility.

The theory behind a post-halving price increase is based on a supply shock. With each of the first three halvings, the daily production of Bitcoin decreased from 50 to 25 to 12.5, and most recently in 2020, to 6.25 BTC per block. This reduction can lead to significant price movements if demand remains strong.

For instance, the year following the 2016 halving saw a nearly 300% rise in Bitcoin’s price, partly attributed to this supply shock.

Macroeconomic impact on Bitcoin halving cycles

The broader economic environment plays a crucial role in shaping the impact of Bitcoin halvings on its price.

For example, the 2020 halving coincided with the period of loose monetary policies, including near-zero interest rates in the U.S. This unique situation contributed to Bitcoin’s appeal as a “digital gold,” helping its price to soar from around $8,000 at the time of the halving in May 2020 to an all-time high of nearly $69,000 by November 2021.

BTC/USD vs. U.S. M2 supply weekly performance chart. Source: TradingView 

Last Bitcoin halving will occur next century

Thanks to the halving process, the final Bitcoin is projected to be mined around the year 2140. After the last halving, miners will no longer receive block rewards in new BTC but will rely solely on transaction fees for revenue.

This shift could fundamentally change Bitcoin’s security and economic model, influencing everything from miner participation to transaction costs.

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.